TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tomašević, Igor
AU  - Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela
AU  - Jambrak, Anet Rezek
AU  - Zsolt, Szendro
AU  - Zotte, Antonella Dalle
AU  - Martinović, Aleksandra
AU  - Prodanov, Mirko
AU  - Solowiej, Bartosz
AU  - Sirbu, Alexandrina
AU  - Subić, Jonel
AU  - Roljević, Svetlana
AU  - Semenova, Anastasia
AU  - Krocko, Miro
AU  - Duckova, Viera
AU  - Getya, Andriy
AU  - Kravchenko, Oksana
AU  - Đekić, Ilija
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5403
AB  - This investigation provides an important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety management and reflects on its food safety (FS) climate or the human route of its FS culture. Investigation was conducted in 10 Central and Eastern European countries involving more than 500 food companies. Overall FS climate was assessed as good. The availability of infrastructure was perceived the same in all countries although "resources" was the lowest scored climate component. Uncertainty avoiding national cultures had a stronger preference towards written FS procedures and instructions. FS climate was better assessed in bigger companies because small companies observed weaker availability of resources, smaller number of procedures and instructions and reduced risk awareness. FS communication and commitment were not affected by company size. The share of food companies without FS system was five times higher in small compared to big companies. No effect of FS management level or riskiness level on FS climate scores was apparent. Food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between FS leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate similarly. The strongest FS climate segmentation in Central and Eastern Europe food companies was observed in terms of the EU membership status. EU operating food companies managed to develop a very good and distinctive FS climate, with better-perceived leadership, communication, commitment, resources and risk awareness than non-EU food companies. Transitional economic environment of non-EU countries have undesirably influenced the organisational and technological support in their companies and employees perceptions of FS climate.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Food Control
T1  - Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe
VL  - 114
DO  - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tomašević, Igor and Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela and Jambrak, Anet Rezek and Zsolt, Szendro and Zotte, Antonella Dalle and Martinović, Aleksandra and Prodanov, Mirko and Solowiej, Bartosz and Sirbu, Alexandrina and Subić, Jonel and Roljević, Svetlana and Semenova, Anastasia and Krocko, Miro and Duckova, Viera and Getya, Andriy and Kravchenko, Oksana and Đekić, Ilija",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This investigation provides an important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety management and reflects on its food safety (FS) climate or the human route of its FS culture. Investigation was conducted in 10 Central and Eastern European countries involving more than 500 food companies. Overall FS climate was assessed as good. The availability of infrastructure was perceived the same in all countries although "resources" was the lowest scored climate component. Uncertainty avoiding national cultures had a stronger preference towards written FS procedures and instructions. FS climate was better assessed in bigger companies because small companies observed weaker availability of resources, smaller number of procedures and instructions and reduced risk awareness. FS communication and commitment were not affected by company size. The share of food companies without FS system was five times higher in small compared to big companies. No effect of FS management level or riskiness level on FS climate scores was apparent. Food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between FS leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate similarly. The strongest FS climate segmentation in Central and Eastern Europe food companies was observed in terms of the EU membership status. EU operating food companies managed to develop a very good and distinctive FS climate, with better-perceived leadership, communication, commitment, resources and risk awareness than non-EU food companies. Transitional economic environment of non-EU countries have undesirably influenced the organisational and technological support in their companies and employees perceptions of FS climate.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Food Control",
title = "Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe",
volume = "114",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238"
}

Tomašević, I., Bursać-Kovačević, D., Jambrak, A. R., Zsolt, S., Zotte, A. D., Martinović, A., Prodanov, M., Solowiej, B., Sirbu, A., Subić, J., Roljević, S., Semenova, A., Krocko, M., Duckova, V., Getya, A., Kravchenko, O.,& Đekić, I.. (2020). Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe. in Food Control
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238

Tomašević I, Bursać-Kovačević D, Jambrak AR, Zsolt S, Zotte AD, Martinović A, Prodanov M, Solowiej B, Sirbu A, Subić J, Roljević S, Semenova A, Krocko M, Duckova V, Getya A, Kravchenko O, Đekić I. Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe. in Food Control. 2020;114.
doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238 .

Tomašević, Igor, Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela, Jambrak, Anet Rezek, Zsolt, Szendro, Zotte, Antonella Dalle, Martinović, Aleksandra, Prodanov, Mirko, Solowiej, Bartosz, Sirbu, Alexandrina, Subić, Jonel, Roljević, Svetlana, Semenova, Anastasia, Krocko, Miro, Duckova, Viera, Getya, Andriy, Kravchenko, Oksana, Đekić, Ilija, "Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe" in Food Control, 114 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tomašević, Igor
AU  - Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela
AU  - Jambrak, Anet Rezek
AU  - Szendro, Katalin
AU  - Zotte, Antonella Dalle
AU  - Prodanov, Mirko
AU  - Solowiej, Bartosz
AU  - Sirbu, Alexandrina
AU  - Subić, Jonel
AU  - Roljević, Svetlana
AU  - Semenova, Anastasia
AU  - Krocko, Miro
AU  - Duckova, Viera
AU  - Getya, Andriy
AU  - Kravchenko, Oksana
AU  - Đekić, Ilija
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5410
AB  - Important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety (FS) management and reflects on its food safety climate or the human route of its food safety culture is provided. Novel FS climate self-assessment tool was developed and validated by 65 FS experts from governmental agencies, third party certification bodies, food sector associations, universities and food industry. Three original FS climate components: FS knowledge, business priorities and FS legislation, were introduced and their nine components were assessed in nine Central and Eastern European countries involving 470 food companies. FS knowledge was better assessed in big and medium sized than in small companies. Knowledge component was equally assessed as good, irrespective of the FS risk profile of the food company surveyed while certified FS management system was charted by higher FS knowledge scores within a same food company. Business priorities in Central and Eastern European food organizations were related to hygiene and food safety and were always put before profit regardless of the company size. Hygiene and food safety were seen equality as a critical business success factor irrespective of the associated level of riskiness. FS climate legislation component in all food organizations surveyed was assessed affirmatively. Central and Eastern European food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between food safety leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate highly and similarly. EU operating food companies had comparable overall FS climate to non-EU companies mostly because they have equally perceived their business priorities and appropriateness of associated FS legislation. The only exception was the FS knowledge that was better assessed in EU than non-EU food enterprises.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Food Control
T1  - Validation of novel food safety climate components and assessment of their indicators in Central and Eastern European food industry
VL  - 117
DO  - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107357
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tomašević, Igor and Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela and Jambrak, Anet Rezek and Szendro, Katalin and Zotte, Antonella Dalle and Prodanov, Mirko and Solowiej, Bartosz and Sirbu, Alexandrina and Subić, Jonel and Roljević, Svetlana and Semenova, Anastasia and Krocko, Miro and Duckova, Viera and Getya, Andriy and Kravchenko, Oksana and Đekić, Ilija",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety (FS) management and reflects on its food safety climate or the human route of its food safety culture is provided. Novel FS climate self-assessment tool was developed and validated by 65 FS experts from governmental agencies, third party certification bodies, food sector associations, universities and food industry. Three original FS climate components: FS knowledge, business priorities and FS legislation, were introduced and their nine components were assessed in nine Central and Eastern European countries involving 470 food companies. FS knowledge was better assessed in big and medium sized than in small companies. Knowledge component was equally assessed as good, irrespective of the FS risk profile of the food company surveyed while certified FS management system was charted by higher FS knowledge scores within a same food company. Business priorities in Central and Eastern European food organizations were related to hygiene and food safety and were always put before profit regardless of the company size. Hygiene and food safety were seen equality as a critical business success factor irrespective of the associated level of riskiness. FS climate legislation component in all food organizations surveyed was assessed affirmatively. Central and Eastern European food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between food safety leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate highly and similarly. EU operating food companies had comparable overall FS climate to non-EU companies mostly because they have equally perceived their business priorities and appropriateness of associated FS legislation. The only exception was the FS knowledge that was better assessed in EU than non-EU food enterprises.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Food Control",
title = "Validation of novel food safety climate components and assessment of their indicators in Central and Eastern European food industry",
volume = "117",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107357"
}

Tomašević, I., Bursać-Kovačević, D., Jambrak, A. R., Szendro, K., Zotte, A. D., Prodanov, M., Solowiej, B., Sirbu, A., Subić, J., Roljević, S., Semenova, A., Krocko, M., Duckova, V., Getya, A., Kravchenko, O.,& Đekić, I.. (2020). Validation of novel food safety climate components and assessment of their indicators in Central and Eastern European food industry. in Food Control
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107357

Tomašević I, Bursać-Kovačević D, Jambrak AR, Szendro K, Zotte AD, Prodanov M, Solowiej B, Sirbu A, Subić J, Roljević S, Semenova A, Krocko M, Duckova V, Getya A, Kravchenko O, Đekić I. Validation of novel food safety climate components and assessment of their indicators in Central and Eastern European food industry. in Food Control. 2020;117.
doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107357 .

Tomašević, Igor, Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela, Jambrak, Anet Rezek, Szendro, Katalin, Zotte, Antonella Dalle, Prodanov, Mirko, Solowiej, Bartosz, Sirbu, Alexandrina, Subić, Jonel, Roljević, Svetlana, Semenova, Anastasia, Krocko, Miro, Duckova, Viera, Getya, Andriy, Kravchenko, Oksana, Đekić, Ilija, "Validation of novel food safety climate components and assessment of their indicators in Central and Eastern European food industry" in Food Control, 117 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107357 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tomašević, Igor
AU  - Bahelka, Ivan
AU  - Citek, Jaroslav
AU  - Čandek-Potokar, Marjeta
AU  - Đekić, Ilija
AU  - Getya, Andriy
AU  - Guerrero, Luis
AU  - Ivanova, Sonya
AU  - Kusec, Goran
AU  - Nakov, Dimitar
AU  - Solowiej, Bartosz
AU  - Stoica, Maricica
AU  - Szabo, Csaba
AU  - Tudoreanu, Liliana
AU  - Weiler, Ulrike
AU  - Font-i-Furnols, Maria
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5245
AB  - Simple Summary A survey was conducted with 5508 consumers from 13 Eastern European countries. Three clusters of consumers were identified: one with consumers indifferent towards animal welfare; one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, but they believe it is difficult to achieve; and one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, and they believe it is possible to achieve it. The aim of this exploratory work, because of the existing bias on the size of the sample and some of the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, was to investigate the Eastern European consumers' beliefs and attitudes toward animal welfare, to perform a cross-country segmentation analysis and to observe possible differences with their Western European counterparts. For this purpose, a survey was conducted with 5508 consumers from 13 Eastern European countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Croatia, North Macedonia, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Ukraine) using a questionnaire with nine statements about consumers beliefs regarding animal welfare (aspects of management, ethical issues about animals, and consequences of animal welfare on meat quality and price), one statement about the willingness to pay more for meat produced under better welfare conditions, and four statements regarding attitudes toward animal welfare. Differences between countries were detected for all the statements. Moreover, three clusters of consumers were identified: one with consumers indifferent towards animal welfare; one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, but they believe it is difficult to achieve; and one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, and they believe it is possible to achieve it.
PB  - MDPI, BASEL
T2  - Animals
T1  - Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Animal Welfare
IS  - 7
VL  - 10
DO  - 10.3390/ani10071220
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tomašević, Igor and Bahelka, Ivan and Citek, Jaroslav and Čandek-Potokar, Marjeta and Đekić, Ilija and Getya, Andriy and Guerrero, Luis and Ivanova, Sonya and Kusec, Goran and Nakov, Dimitar and Solowiej, Bartosz and Stoica, Maricica and Szabo, Csaba and Tudoreanu, Liliana and Weiler, Ulrike and Font-i-Furnols, Maria",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Simple Summary A survey was conducted with 5508 consumers from 13 Eastern European countries. Three clusters of consumers were identified: one with consumers indifferent towards animal welfare; one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, but they believe it is difficult to achieve; and one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, and they believe it is possible to achieve it. The aim of this exploratory work, because of the existing bias on the size of the sample and some of the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, was to investigate the Eastern European consumers' beliefs and attitudes toward animal welfare, to perform a cross-country segmentation analysis and to observe possible differences with their Western European counterparts. For this purpose, a survey was conducted with 5508 consumers from 13 Eastern European countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Croatia, North Macedonia, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Ukraine) using a questionnaire with nine statements about consumers beliefs regarding animal welfare (aspects of management, ethical issues about animals, and consequences of animal welfare on meat quality and price), one statement about the willingness to pay more for meat produced under better welfare conditions, and four statements regarding attitudes toward animal welfare. Differences between countries were detected for all the statements. Moreover, three clusters of consumers were identified: one with consumers indifferent towards animal welfare; one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, but they believe it is difficult to achieve; and one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, and they believe it is possible to achieve it.",
publisher = "MDPI, BASEL",
journal = "Animals",
title = "Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Animal Welfare",
number = "7",
volume = "10",
doi = "10.3390/ani10071220"
}

Tomašević, I., Bahelka, I., Citek, J., Čandek-Potokar, M., Đekić, I., Getya, A., Guerrero, L., Ivanova, S., Kusec, G., Nakov, D., Solowiej, B., Stoica, M., Szabo, C., Tudoreanu, L., Weiler, U.,& Font-i-Furnols, M.. (2020). Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Animal Welfare. in Animals
MDPI, BASEL., 10(7).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071220

Tomašević I, Bahelka I, Citek J, Čandek-Potokar M, Đekić I, Getya A, Guerrero L, Ivanova S, Kusec G, Nakov D, Solowiej B, Stoica M, Szabo C, Tudoreanu L, Weiler U, Font-i-Furnols M. Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Animal Welfare. in Animals. 2020;10(7).
doi:10.3390/ani10071220 .

Tomašević, Igor, Bahelka, Ivan, Citek, Jaroslav, Čandek-Potokar, Marjeta, Đekić, Ilija, Getya, Andriy, Guerrero, Luis, Ivanova, Sonya, Kusec, Goran, Nakov, Dimitar, Solowiej, Bartosz, Stoica, Maricica, Szabo, Csaba, Tudoreanu, Liliana, Weiler, Ulrike, Font-i-Furnols, Maria, "Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Animal Welfare" in Animals, 10, no. 7 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071220 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Malecki, Jan
AU  - Tomašević, Igor
AU  - Đekić, Ilija
AU  - Solowiej, Bartosz
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5298
AB  - The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of protein sources (algae, pumpkin, wheat, sunflower, rice, soy, hemp, pea, and whey) on selected physicochemical, nutritional, and structural parameters of high-protein bars. Texture properties, such as hardness, fracturability, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness, have changed depending on the type of protein used. A significant increase, in particular the hardness parameter relating to the control sample (whey protein concentrate-WPC80), was noted for bars containing algae, sunflower, and wheat proteins, with high values of the adhesiveness parameter concurrently. The use of proteins from algae, pea, and wheat resulted in a significant reduction in the water activity of the finished product compared to WPC80. Bars made with the use of wheat, hemp and pumpkin proteins had noticeably higher viscosities than other samples. Color of the tested bars measured by means of Computer Vision System (CVS) was from light cream (soy, pea) to dark green (hemp, pumpkin). Bars prepared of wheat and algae proteins had the highest nutritional value, while the lowest one was recorded in products containing sunflower and hemp proteins. There was a clear differentiation of amino acids (g/100 g) and microstructure in bars depending on the type of protein used. However, a slight similarity can be found between whey and soy proteins (amino acids) and between whey and sunflower proteins (microstructure). Obtained results suggest that selection of the right type of protein for a given application may have a significant impact on the physicochemical features and microstructure of high-protein bars and their nutritional values.
PB  - MDPI, BASEL
T2  - Foods
T1  - The Effect of Protein Source on the Physicochemical, Nutritional Properties and Microstructure of High-Protein Bars Intended for Physically Active People
IS  - 10
VL  - 9
DO  - 10.3390/foods9101467
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Malecki, Jan and Tomašević, Igor and Đekić, Ilija and Solowiej, Bartosz",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of protein sources (algae, pumpkin, wheat, sunflower, rice, soy, hemp, pea, and whey) on selected physicochemical, nutritional, and structural parameters of high-protein bars. Texture properties, such as hardness, fracturability, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness, have changed depending on the type of protein used. A significant increase, in particular the hardness parameter relating to the control sample (whey protein concentrate-WPC80), was noted for bars containing algae, sunflower, and wheat proteins, with high values of the adhesiveness parameter concurrently. The use of proteins from algae, pea, and wheat resulted in a significant reduction in the water activity of the finished product compared to WPC80. Bars made with the use of wheat, hemp and pumpkin proteins had noticeably higher viscosities than other samples. Color of the tested bars measured by means of Computer Vision System (CVS) was from light cream (soy, pea) to dark green (hemp, pumpkin). Bars prepared of wheat and algae proteins had the highest nutritional value, while the lowest one was recorded in products containing sunflower and hemp proteins. There was a clear differentiation of amino acids (g/100 g) and microstructure in bars depending on the type of protein used. However, a slight similarity can be found between whey and soy proteins (amino acids) and between whey and sunflower proteins (microstructure). Obtained results suggest that selection of the right type of protein for a given application may have a significant impact on the physicochemical features and microstructure of high-protein bars and their nutritional values.",
publisher = "MDPI, BASEL",
journal = "Foods",
title = "The Effect of Protein Source on the Physicochemical, Nutritional Properties and Microstructure of High-Protein Bars Intended for Physically Active People",
number = "10",
volume = "9",
doi = "10.3390/foods9101467"
}

Malecki, J., Tomašević, I., Đekić, I.,& Solowiej, B.. (2020). The Effect of Protein Source on the Physicochemical, Nutritional Properties and Microstructure of High-Protein Bars Intended for Physically Active People. in Foods
MDPI, BASEL., 9(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101467

Malecki J, Tomašević I, Đekić I, Solowiej B. The Effect of Protein Source on the Physicochemical, Nutritional Properties and Microstructure of High-Protein Bars Intended for Physically Active People. in Foods. 2020;9(10).
doi:10.3390/foods9101467 .

Malecki, Jan, Tomašević, Igor, Đekić, Ilija, Solowiej, Bartosz, "The Effect of Protein Source on the Physicochemical, Nutritional Properties and Microstructure of High-Protein Bars Intended for Physically Active People" in Foods, 9, no. 10 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101467 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tomašević, Igor
AU  - Bahelka, Ivan
AU  - Čandek-Potokar, Marjeta
AU  - Citek, Jaroslav
AU  - Đekić, Ilija
AU  - Djurkin Kusec, Ivona
AU  - Getya, Andriy
AU  - Guerrero, Luis
AU  - Iordachescu, Gabriela
AU  - Ivanova, Sonya
AU  - Nakov, Dimitar
AU  - Solowiej, Bartosz
AU  - Szabo, Csaba
AU  - Tudoreanu, Liliana
AU  - Weiler, Ulrike
AU  - Font-i-Furnols, Maria
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5359
AB  - Castration of male piglets is a common practice to avoid boar taint but is being questioned. The present work has an exploratory character and aims to investigate the beliefs and attitudes of Eastern European consumers regarding boar taint, surgical castration immunocastration and perception of meat from castrated pigs and to find out possible segments of consumers regarding these attitudes and beliefs. For this purpose, a consumer study was carried out involving 5508 consumers from 13 Eastern European countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Croatia, North Macedonia, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine). The questionnaire included statements related to beliefs about castration and perception of meat from castrated pigs, attitudes towards meat from castrated pigs. Results show that in general beliefs and attitudes of the consumers are not defined, probably because of the lack of knowledge (information was not provided to the consumers) towards these issues. Three different clusters of consumers were obtained with different beliefs towards castration.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Meat Science
T1  - Attitudes and beliefs of Eastern European consumers towards piglet castration and meat from castrated pigs
VL  - 160
DO  - 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107965
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tomašević, Igor and Bahelka, Ivan and Čandek-Potokar, Marjeta and Citek, Jaroslav and Đekić, Ilija and Djurkin Kusec, Ivona and Getya, Andriy and Guerrero, Luis and Iordachescu, Gabriela and Ivanova, Sonya and Nakov, Dimitar and Solowiej, Bartosz and Szabo, Csaba and Tudoreanu, Liliana and Weiler, Ulrike and Font-i-Furnols, Maria",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Castration of male piglets is a common practice to avoid boar taint but is being questioned. The present work has an exploratory character and aims to investigate the beliefs and attitudes of Eastern European consumers regarding boar taint, surgical castration immunocastration and perception of meat from castrated pigs and to find out possible segments of consumers regarding these attitudes and beliefs. For this purpose, a consumer study was carried out involving 5508 consumers from 13 Eastern European countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Croatia, North Macedonia, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine). The questionnaire included statements related to beliefs about castration and perception of meat from castrated pigs, attitudes towards meat from castrated pigs. Results show that in general beliefs and attitudes of the consumers are not defined, probably because of the lack of knowledge (information was not provided to the consumers) towards these issues. Three different clusters of consumers were obtained with different beliefs towards castration.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Meat Science",
title = "Attitudes and beliefs of Eastern European consumers towards piglet castration and meat from castrated pigs",
volume = "160",
doi = "10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107965"
}

Tomašević, I., Bahelka, I., Čandek-Potokar, M., Citek, J., Đekić, I., Djurkin Kusec, I., Getya, A., Guerrero, L., Iordachescu, G., Ivanova, S., Nakov, D., Solowiej, B., Szabo, C., Tudoreanu, L., Weiler, U.,& Font-i-Furnols, M.. (2020). Attitudes and beliefs of Eastern European consumers towards piglet castration and meat from castrated pigs. in Meat Science
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107965

Tomašević I, Bahelka I, Čandek-Potokar M, Citek J, Đekić I, Djurkin Kusec I, Getya A, Guerrero L, Iordachescu G, Ivanova S, Nakov D, Solowiej B, Szabo C, Tudoreanu L, Weiler U, Font-i-Furnols M. Attitudes and beliefs of Eastern European consumers towards piglet castration and meat from castrated pigs. in Meat Science. 2020;160.
doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107965 .

Tomašević, Igor, Bahelka, Ivan, Čandek-Potokar, Marjeta, Citek, Jaroslav, Đekić, Ilija, Djurkin Kusec, Ivona, Getya, Andriy, Guerrero, Luis, Iordachescu, Gabriela, Ivanova, Sonya, Nakov, Dimitar, Solowiej, Bartosz, Szabo, Csaba, Tudoreanu, Liliana, Weiler, Ulrike, Font-i-Furnols, Maria, "Attitudes and beliefs of Eastern European consumers towards piglet castration and meat from castrated pigs" in Meat Science, 160 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107965 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tomašević, Igor
AU  - Novaković, Saša
AU  - Solowiej, Bartosz
AU  - Zdolec, Nevijo
AU  - Skunca, Dubravka
AU  - Krocko, Miroslav
AU  - Nedomova, Sarka
AU  - Kolaj, Rezear
AU  - Aleksiev, Georgi
AU  - Djekić, Ilija
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4761
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Meat Science
T1  - Consumers' perceptions, attitudes and perceived quality of game meat in ten European countries
EP  - 13
SP  - 5
VL  - 142
DO  - 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.016
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tomašević, Igor and Novaković, Saša and Solowiej, Bartosz and Zdolec, Nevijo and Skunca, Dubravka and Krocko, Miroslav and Nedomova, Sarka and Kolaj, Rezear and Aleksiev, Georgi and Djekić, Ilija",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Meat Science",
title = "Consumers' perceptions, attitudes and perceived quality of game meat in ten European countries",
pages = "13-5",
volume = "142",
doi = "10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.016"
}

Tomašević, I., Novaković, S., Solowiej, B., Zdolec, N., Skunca, D., Krocko, M., Nedomova, S., Kolaj, R., Aleksiev, G.,& Djekić, I.. (2018). Consumers' perceptions, attitudes and perceived quality of game meat in ten European countries. in Meat Science
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 142, 5-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.016

Tomašević I, Novaković S, Solowiej B, Zdolec N, Skunca D, Krocko M, Nedomova S, Kolaj R, Aleksiev G, Djekić I. Consumers' perceptions, attitudes and perceived quality of game meat in ten European countries. in Meat Science. 2018;142:5-13.
doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.016 .

Tomašević, Igor, Novaković, Saša, Solowiej, Bartosz, Zdolec, Nevijo, Skunca, Dubravka, Krocko, Miroslav, Nedomova, Sarka, Kolaj, Rezear, Aleksiev, Georgi, Djekić, Ilija, "Consumers' perceptions, attitudes and perceived quality of game meat in ten European countries" in Meat Science, 142 (2018):5-13,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.016 . .