TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tomašević, Igor
AU  - Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela
AU  - Jambrak, Anet Rezek
AU  - Zsolt, Szendro
AU  - Zotte, Antonella Dalle
AU  - Martinović, Aleksandra
AU  - Prodanov, Mirko
AU  - Solowiej, Bartosz
AU  - Sirbu, Alexandrina
AU  - Subić, Jonel
AU  - Roljević, Svetlana
AU  - Semenova, Anastasia
AU  - Krocko, Miro
AU  - Duckova, Viera
AU  - Getya, Andriy
AU  - Kravchenko, Oksana
AU  - Đekić, Ilija
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5403
AB  - This investigation provides an important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety management and reflects on its food safety (FS) climate or the human route of its FS culture. Investigation was conducted in 10 Central and Eastern European countries involving more than 500 food companies. Overall FS climate was assessed as good. The availability of infrastructure was perceived the same in all countries although "resources" was the lowest scored climate component. Uncertainty avoiding national cultures had a stronger preference towards written FS procedures and instructions. FS climate was better assessed in bigger companies because small companies observed weaker availability of resources, smaller number of procedures and instructions and reduced risk awareness. FS communication and commitment were not affected by company size. The share of food companies without FS system was five times higher in small compared to big companies. No effect of FS management level or riskiness level on FS climate scores was apparent. Food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between FS leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate similarly. The strongest FS climate segmentation in Central and Eastern Europe food companies was observed in terms of the EU membership status. EU operating food companies managed to develop a very good and distinctive FS climate, with better-perceived leadership, communication, commitment, resources and risk awareness than non-EU food companies. Transitional economic environment of non-EU countries have undesirably influenced the organisational and technological support in their companies and employees perceptions of FS climate.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Food Control
T1  - Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe
VL  - 114
DO  - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tomašević, Igor and Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela and Jambrak, Anet Rezek and Zsolt, Szendro and Zotte, Antonella Dalle and Martinović, Aleksandra and Prodanov, Mirko and Solowiej, Bartosz and Sirbu, Alexandrina and Subić, Jonel and Roljević, Svetlana and Semenova, Anastasia and Krocko, Miro and Duckova, Viera and Getya, Andriy and Kravchenko, Oksana and Đekić, Ilija",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This investigation provides an important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety management and reflects on its food safety (FS) climate or the human route of its FS culture. Investigation was conducted in 10 Central and Eastern European countries involving more than 500 food companies. Overall FS climate was assessed as good. The availability of infrastructure was perceived the same in all countries although "resources" was the lowest scored climate component. Uncertainty avoiding national cultures had a stronger preference towards written FS procedures and instructions. FS climate was better assessed in bigger companies because small companies observed weaker availability of resources, smaller number of procedures and instructions and reduced risk awareness. FS communication and commitment were not affected by company size. The share of food companies without FS system was five times higher in small compared to big companies. No effect of FS management level or riskiness level on FS climate scores was apparent. Food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between FS leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate similarly. The strongest FS climate segmentation in Central and Eastern Europe food companies was observed in terms of the EU membership status. EU operating food companies managed to develop a very good and distinctive FS climate, with better-perceived leadership, communication, commitment, resources and risk awareness than non-EU food companies. Transitional economic environment of non-EU countries have undesirably influenced the organisational and technological support in their companies and employees perceptions of FS climate.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Food Control",
title = "Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe",
volume = "114",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238"
}

Tomašević, I., Bursać-Kovačević, D., Jambrak, A. R., Zsolt, S., Zotte, A. D., Martinović, A., Prodanov, M., Solowiej, B., Sirbu, A., Subić, J., Roljević, S., Semenova, A., Krocko, M., Duckova, V., Getya, A., Kravchenko, O.,& Đekić, I.. (2020). Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe. in Food Control
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238

Tomašević I, Bursać-Kovačević D, Jambrak AR, Zsolt S, Zotte AD, Martinović A, Prodanov M, Solowiej B, Sirbu A, Subić J, Roljević S, Semenova A, Krocko M, Duckova V, Getya A, Kravchenko O, Đekić I. Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe. in Food Control. 2020;114.
doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238 .

Tomašević, Igor, Bursać-Kovačević, Danijela, Jambrak, Anet Rezek, Zsolt, Szendro, Zotte, Antonella Dalle, Martinović, Aleksandra, Prodanov, Mirko, Solowiej, Bartosz, Sirbu, Alexandrina, Subić, Jonel, Roljević, Svetlana, Semenova, Anastasia, Krocko, Miro, Duckova, Viera, Getya, Andriy, Kravchenko, Oksana, Đekić, Ilija, "Comprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europe" in Food Control, 114 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238 . .