Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorTomašević, Igor
dc.creatorBursać-Kovačević, Danijela
dc.creatorJambrak, Anet Rezek
dc.creatorZsolt, Szendro
dc.creatorZotte, Antonella Dalle
dc.creatorMartinović, Aleksandra
dc.creatorProdanov, Mirko
dc.creatorSolowiej, Bartosz
dc.creatorSirbu, Alexandrina
dc.creatorSubić, Jonel
dc.creatorRoljević, Svetlana
dc.creatorSemenova, Anastasia
dc.creatorKrocko, Miro
dc.creatorDuckova, Viera
dc.creatorGetya, Andriy
dc.creatorKravchenko, Oksana
dc.creatorĐekić, Ilija
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T22:58:26Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T22:58:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0956-7135
dc.identifier.urihttp://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5403
dc.description.abstractThis investigation provides an important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety management and reflects on its food safety (FS) climate or the human route of its FS culture. Investigation was conducted in 10 Central and Eastern European countries involving more than 500 food companies. Overall FS climate was assessed as good. The availability of infrastructure was perceived the same in all countries although "resources" was the lowest scored climate component. Uncertainty avoiding national cultures had a stronger preference towards written FS procedures and instructions. FS climate was better assessed in bigger companies because small companies observed weaker availability of resources, smaller number of procedures and instructions and reduced risk awareness. FS communication and commitment were not affected by company size. The share of food companies without FS system was five times higher in small compared to big companies. No effect of FS management level or riskiness level on FS climate scores was apparent. Food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between FS leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate similarly. The strongest FS climate segmentation in Central and Eastern Europe food companies was observed in terms of the EU membership status. EU operating food companies managed to develop a very good and distinctive FS climate, with better-perceived leadership, communication, commitment, resources and risk awareness than non-EU food companies. Transitional economic environment of non-EU countries have undesirably influenced the organisational and technological support in their companies and employees perceptions of FS climate.en
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceFood Control
dc.subjectFood safety climateen
dc.subjectNational cultureen
dc.subjectFood safety cultureen
dc.subjectFood safety management systemsen
dc.subjectHACCPen
dc.subjectEastern Europeen
dc.subjectCentral Europeen
dc.titleComprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europeen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.other114: -
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.citation.volume114
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082126502
dc.identifier.wos000528281100027
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу