Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorLeal Filho, Walter
dc.creatorGuedes Vidal, Diogo
dc.creatorChen, Chen
dc.creatorPetrova, Maria
dc.creatorPimenta Dinis, Maria Alzira
dc.creatorYang, Peter
dc.creatorRogers, Steven
dc.creatorÁlvarez‑Castañón, Lorena
dc.creatorĐekic, Ilija
dc.creatorSharif, Ayyoob
dc.creatorNeiva, Samara
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-15T10:09:50Z
dc.date.available2022-07-15T10:09:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2190-4707
dc.identifier.issn2190-4715
dc.identifier.urihttp://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6137
dc.description.abstractBackground: The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires much planning and the provision of resources, especially regarding the necessary investments, technologies and infrastructures needed. Yet, it is presently unclear how available these elements are, what gaps exist, what changes have taken place in terms of their availability since the adoption of the SDGs and what their requirements will be in the future. The knowledge gap has become even more concerning because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a bibliometric analysis, an assessment of the global progress of SDG implementation and requirements, identifying challenges through the development of a matrix, and a set of 11 case studies to triangulate the holistic analysis, an assessment of the global progress of the SDGs implementation and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this process was carried out. Results: The fndings suggest that the scope and width of resources limitation are currently undermining the imple‑ mentation of the SDGs. Apart from the fact that the pace of progress has been insufcient, the potential of the SDGs in pursuing sustainability and improving life quality is not fully realised. This trend suggests that a substantial accelera‑ tion of the eforts is needed, especially for the fve SDGs whose progress since 2015 has not been optimal, namely SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, while SDG3, SDG7, SDG9, SDG14, and SDG17 show signs of progress. The case studies showed that diferent industries have dissimilar efects on achieving the SDGs, with the food sector cor‑ relating with 15 SDGs, as opposed to the energy sector correlating with 6 SDGs. Accordingly, the priority level assess‑ ment in terms of achieving the SDGs, points to the need to further advance the above-mentioned fve SDGs, i.e., 2, 11, 13, 15 and 16. Conclusions: This study flls in a knowledge gap in respect of the current need for and availability of investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to allow countries to pursue the SDGs. It is suggested that this availability is rather limited in specifc contexts. In respect of the needs to be addressed, these include resource-related constraints, limited technologies and infrastructures, afecting SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, whose progress needs to be enhanced. Since the global progress in the process of implementation of the SDGs depends directly and indirectly on addressing the resource gaps, it is suggested that this topic be further investigated, so that the present imbalances.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceEnvironmental Sciences Europesr
dc.subjectInvestment challengessr
dc.subjectTechnological challengessr
dc.subjectInfrastructural challengessr
dc.subjectAchievement of UN SDGssr
dc.subjectBibliometric analysissr
dc.subjectCase studiessr
dc.titleAn assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGssr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.epage17
dc.citation.rankM21
dc.citation.spage2
dc.citation.volume34:58
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/23924/An_assessment_of_pub_2022.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу