University of Belgrade - Faculty of Agriculture
AgroSpace - Faculty of Agriculture Repository
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   AgroSpace
  • Poljoprivredni fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   AgroSpace
  • Poljoprivredni fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Selection of the best pollinizer of ‘Celina’ pear

Authorized Users Only
2018
Authors
Fotirić-Akšić, Milica
Cerović, Radosav
Slavković, D.
Hjeltnes, S.H.
Meland, Mekjell
Conference object (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The Norwegian newly bred pear cultivar, Celina/QTee®, which was launched in 2010, has been released from the Norwegian breeding program that was initiated in 1983. It was derived from the combination ‘Colorée de Juillet’ × ‘Williams’. In Norway the flowering is medium to late and it ripens in the beginning of September. It has large attractive fruits with a red blush. It has a good fruit quality, storability and shelf life. Cross pollination is necessary in order to have high yields of this diploid cultivar. Pollination of ‘Celina’ with pollen of four donors (‘Conference’, ‘Kristina’, ‘Anna’ and ‘Fritjof’), together with open- and self-pollination were studied in this experiment during the 2016 season in Norway. The dynamics of the pollen tube growth (third, sixth and ninth day after anthesis) in style (upper, middle and lower third) and parts of the ovary in all crossing combination, were observed by fluorescent microscopy. Besides giving the best results regarding the average number ...of pollen tubes in different parts of pistils and the dynamics of pollen tube growth, ‘Conference’ was the only one of which the pollen tubes didn’t show any incompatible signs while growing through the transmitting tissue of the ‘Celina’ style. According to those preliminary results, ‘Conference’ was the best pollenizer, followed by ‘Kristina’. The study has to be repeated for another season.

Keywords:
Climate / Fluorescence microscopy / Phenology / Pollen tube growth / Prunus communis L
Source:
Acta Horticulturae, 2018, 1229, 365-370
Publisher:
  • International Society for Horticultural Science
Funding / projects:
  • The project came from The Research Council of Norway. Project no. 244510 ‘Increased volume and the consumers preference of new Norwegian breed pear cultivars’.

DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1229.54

ISSN: 0567-7572

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85060030066
[ Google Scholar ]
4
URI
http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4799
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Poljoprivredni fakultet
TY  - CONF
AU  - Fotirić-Akšić, Milica
AU  - Cerović, Radosav
AU  - Slavković, D.
AU  - Hjeltnes, S.H.
AU  - Meland, Mekjell
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4799
AB  - The Norwegian newly bred pear cultivar, Celina/QTee®, which was launched in 2010, has been released from the Norwegian breeding program that was initiated in 1983. It was derived from the combination ‘Colorée de Juillet’ × ‘Williams’. In Norway the flowering is medium to late and it ripens in the beginning of September. It has large attractive fruits with a red blush. It has a good fruit quality, storability and shelf life. Cross pollination is necessary in order to have high yields of this diploid cultivar. Pollination of ‘Celina’ with pollen of four donors (‘Conference’, ‘Kristina’, ‘Anna’ and ‘Fritjof’), together with open- and self-pollination were studied in this experiment during the 2016 season in Norway. The dynamics of the pollen tube growth (third, sixth and ninth day after anthesis) in style (upper, middle and lower third) and parts of the ovary in all crossing combination, were observed by fluorescent microscopy. Besides giving the best results regarding the average number of pollen tubes in different parts of pistils and the dynamics of pollen tube growth, ‘Conference’ was the only one of which the pollen tubes didn’t show any incompatible signs while growing through the transmitting tissue of the ‘Celina’ style. According to those preliminary results, ‘Conference’ was the best pollenizer, followed by ‘Kristina’. The study has to be repeated for another season.
PB  - International Society for Horticultural Science
C3  - Acta Horticulturae
T1  - Selection of the best pollinizer of ‘Celina’ pear
EP  - 370
SP  - 365
VL  - 1229
DO  - 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1229.54
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Fotirić-Akšić, Milica and Cerović, Radosav and Slavković, D. and Hjeltnes, S.H. and Meland, Mekjell",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The Norwegian newly bred pear cultivar, Celina/QTee®, which was launched in 2010, has been released from the Norwegian breeding program that was initiated in 1983. It was derived from the combination ‘Colorée de Juillet’ × ‘Williams’. In Norway the flowering is medium to late and it ripens in the beginning of September. It has large attractive fruits with a red blush. It has a good fruit quality, storability and shelf life. Cross pollination is necessary in order to have high yields of this diploid cultivar. Pollination of ‘Celina’ with pollen of four donors (‘Conference’, ‘Kristina’, ‘Anna’ and ‘Fritjof’), together with open- and self-pollination were studied in this experiment during the 2016 season in Norway. The dynamics of the pollen tube growth (third, sixth and ninth day after anthesis) in style (upper, middle and lower third) and parts of the ovary in all crossing combination, were observed by fluorescent microscopy. Besides giving the best results regarding the average number of pollen tubes in different parts of pistils and the dynamics of pollen tube growth, ‘Conference’ was the only one of which the pollen tubes didn’t show any incompatible signs while growing through the transmitting tissue of the ‘Celina’ style. According to those preliminary results, ‘Conference’ was the best pollenizer, followed by ‘Kristina’. The study has to be repeated for another season.",
publisher = "International Society for Horticultural Science",
journal = "Acta Horticulturae",
title = "Selection of the best pollinizer of ‘Celina’ pear",
pages = "370-365",
volume = "1229",
doi = "10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1229.54"
}
Fotirić-Akšić, M., Cerović, R., Slavković, D., Hjeltnes, S.H.,& Meland, M.. (2018). Selection of the best pollinizer of ‘Celina’ pear. in Acta Horticulturae
International Society for Horticultural Science., 1229, 365-370.
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1229.54
Fotirić-Akšić M, Cerović R, Slavković D, Hjeltnes S, Meland M. Selection of the best pollinizer of ‘Celina’ pear. in Acta Horticulturae. 2018;1229:365-370.
doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1229.54 .
Fotirić-Akšić, Milica, Cerović, Radosav, Slavković, D., Hjeltnes, S.H., Meland, Mekjell, "Selection of the best pollinizer of ‘Celina’ pear" in Acta Horticulturae, 1229 (2018):365-370,
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1229.54 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the AgroSpace Repository | Send Feedback

re3dataOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the AgroSpace Repository | Send Feedback

re3dataOpenAIRERCUB