Hygienic design of a unit for supercritical fluid drying - case study
Samo za registrovane korisnike
2018
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)

Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the hygienic design of a scalable unit for supercritical carbon dioxide drying of food. Design/methodology/approach For the purpose of this study, a checklist has been developed, covering requirements from sanitary standards and industry-tailored guidelines. Beyond hygienic design, failure mode and effects analysis of the results were performed to assess the potential food safety risks that may arise from failures to hygienic design requirements. Findings The overall score of the hygienic design was 46 percent. This kind of evaluation revealed two types of nonconformities. The first type was related to inadequate sanitary procedures. The second type was associated to design failures. Research limitations/implications The highest risk was designated to problems related to cleaning and sanitation followed by risks associated with the formation of dead zones and biofilms. Practical implications This study provides valuable insight to engine...ers and food technologists on hygienic design issues. Originality/value Application of a similar methodology was used for evaluating hygienic design of other non-thermal food technologies.
Ključne reči:
Failure modes and effects analysis / Hygienic design / Supercritical fluid dryingIzvor:
British Food Journal, 2018, 120, 9, 2155-2165Izdavač:
- Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley
DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0052
ISSN: 0007-070X
WoS: 000443148700017
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85052434438
Institucija/grupa
Poljoprivredni fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Djekić, Ilija AU - Tomić, Nikola AU - Šmigić, Nada AU - Udovički, Božidar AU - Hofland, Gerard AU - Rajković, Andreja PY - 2018 UR - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4664 AB - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the hygienic design of a scalable unit for supercritical carbon dioxide drying of food. Design/methodology/approach For the purpose of this study, a checklist has been developed, covering requirements from sanitary standards and industry-tailored guidelines. Beyond hygienic design, failure mode and effects analysis of the results were performed to assess the potential food safety risks that may arise from failures to hygienic design requirements. Findings The overall score of the hygienic design was 46 percent. This kind of evaluation revealed two types of nonconformities. The first type was related to inadequate sanitary procedures. The second type was associated to design failures. Research limitations/implications The highest risk was designated to problems related to cleaning and sanitation followed by risks associated with the formation of dead zones and biofilms. Practical implications This study provides valuable insight to engineers and food technologists on hygienic design issues. Originality/value Application of a similar methodology was used for evaluating hygienic design of other non-thermal food technologies. PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley T2 - British Food Journal T1 - Hygienic design of a unit for supercritical fluid drying - case study EP - 2165 IS - 9 SP - 2155 VL - 120 DO - 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0052 ER -
@article{ author = "Djekić, Ilija and Tomić, Nikola and Šmigić, Nada and Udovički, Božidar and Hofland, Gerard and Rajković, Andreja", year = "2018", abstract = "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the hygienic design of a scalable unit for supercritical carbon dioxide drying of food. Design/methodology/approach For the purpose of this study, a checklist has been developed, covering requirements from sanitary standards and industry-tailored guidelines. Beyond hygienic design, failure mode and effects analysis of the results were performed to assess the potential food safety risks that may arise from failures to hygienic design requirements. Findings The overall score of the hygienic design was 46 percent. This kind of evaluation revealed two types of nonconformities. The first type was related to inadequate sanitary procedures. The second type was associated to design failures. Research limitations/implications The highest risk was designated to problems related to cleaning and sanitation followed by risks associated with the formation of dead zones and biofilms. Practical implications This study provides valuable insight to engineers and food technologists on hygienic design issues. Originality/value Application of a similar methodology was used for evaluating hygienic design of other non-thermal food technologies.", publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley", journal = "British Food Journal", title = "Hygienic design of a unit for supercritical fluid drying - case study", pages = "2165-2155", number = "9", volume = "120", doi = "10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0052" }
Djekić, I., Tomić, N., Šmigić, N., Udovički, B., Hofland, G.,& Rajković, A.. (2018). Hygienic design of a unit for supercritical fluid drying - case study. in British Food Journal Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley., 120(9), 2155-2165. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0052
Djekić I, Tomić N, Šmigić N, Udovički B, Hofland G, Rajković A. Hygienic design of a unit for supercritical fluid drying - case study. in British Food Journal. 2018;120(9):2155-2165. doi:10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0052 .
Djekić, Ilija, Tomić, Nikola, Šmigić, Nada, Udovički, Božidar, Hofland, Gerard, Rajković, Andreja, "Hygienic design of a unit for supercritical fluid drying - case study" in British Food Journal, 120, no. 9 (2018):2155-2165, https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0052 . .