University of Belgrade - Faculty of Agriculture
AgroSpace - Faculty of Agriculture Repository
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   AgroSpace
  • Poljoprivredni fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   AgroSpace
  • Poljoprivredni fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Multi attribute assessment approach in vegetable production

Pristup višeatributivne procene u proizvodnji povrća

Thumbnail
2017
4574.pdf (466.7Kb)
Authors
Vico, Grujica
Govedarica-Lučić, Aleksandra
Rajić, Zoran
Bodiroga, Radomir
Mičić, Ivan
Zec-Sambol, Silvija
Mičić, Marija
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Two types of economic effectiveness and two types of economic efficiency, as well as three types of indicators as nutritional quality criteria were used in this paper for ranking certain winter lettuce growing technologies. Four certain types of growing technologies of winter lettuce in greenhouses were ranked by two multi-attribute decision making methods. Results of ranking for both methods, SAW and TOPSIS are shown. Alternatives were ranked by three different scenarios with different weight coefficients. The type of growing technology with combination of mulching + agro textile is the best ranked one according both methods and all scenarios. The SAW method showed more sensitivity on weight coefficients changes than TOPSIS.
U radu je korišćeno dvije vrste kriterijuma ekonomske efektivnosti i dvije vrste kriterijuma ekonomske efikasnosti, kao i tri indikatora nutritivnog kvaliteta za rangiranje različitih tehnologija gajenja zimske salate. Korišćenjem dvije metode višeatributivnog odlučivanja, izvršeno je rangiranje četiri različite tehnologije gajenja zimske salate u zaštićenom prostoru. Prikazani su rezultati rangiranja na osnovu oba korišćena metoda, SAW i TOPSIS. Alternative su rangirane kroz tri scenarija koji se razlikuju po težinskim koeficijentima. Tehnologija proizvodnje koja podrazumjeva malč+agrotekstil pokazala se kao najbolja alternativa pri korišćenju oba metoda i svih scenarija. SAW metod se pokazao kao senzitivniji na promjene težinskih koeficijenata u odnosu na TOPSIS metod.
Keywords:
multi-attribute ranking / SAW / TOPSIS / vegetable production / method / višeatributivno odlučivanje / SAW / TOPSIS / proizvodnja povrća / metod
Source:
Ekonomika poljoprivrede, 2017, 64, 4, 1355-1364
Publisher:
  • Naučno društvo agrarnih ekonomista Balkana, Beograd, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede, Beograd i Akademija ekonomskih nauka, Bukurešt

DOI: 10.5937/ekoPolj1704355V

ISSN: 0352-3462

WoS: 000425048600003

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4577
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Poljoprivredni fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vico, Grujica
AU  - Govedarica-Lučić, Aleksandra
AU  - Rajić, Zoran
AU  - Bodiroga, Radomir
AU  - Mičić, Ivan
AU  - Zec-Sambol, Silvija
AU  - Mičić, Marija
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4577
AB  - Two types of economic effectiveness and two types of economic efficiency, as well as three types of indicators as nutritional quality criteria were used in this paper for ranking certain winter lettuce growing technologies. Four certain types of growing technologies of winter lettuce in greenhouses were ranked by two multi-attribute decision making methods. Results of ranking for both methods, SAW and TOPSIS are shown. Alternatives were ranked by three different scenarios with different weight coefficients. The type of growing technology with combination of mulching + agro textile is the best ranked one according both methods and all scenarios. The SAW method showed more sensitivity on weight coefficients changes than TOPSIS.
AB  - U radu je korišćeno dvije vrste kriterijuma ekonomske efektivnosti i dvije vrste kriterijuma ekonomske efikasnosti, kao i tri indikatora nutritivnog kvaliteta za rangiranje različitih tehnologija gajenja zimske salate. Korišćenjem dvije metode višeatributivnog odlučivanja, izvršeno je rangiranje četiri različite tehnologije gajenja zimske salate u zaštićenom prostoru. Prikazani su rezultati rangiranja na osnovu oba korišćena metoda, SAW i TOPSIS. Alternative su rangirane kroz tri scenarija koji se razlikuju po težinskim koeficijentima. Tehnologija proizvodnje koja podrazumjeva malč+agrotekstil pokazala se kao najbolja alternativa pri korišćenju oba metoda i svih scenarija. SAW metod se pokazao kao senzitivniji na promjene težinskih koeficijenata u odnosu na TOPSIS metod.
PB  - Naučno društvo agrarnih ekonomista Balkana, Beograd, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede, Beograd i Akademija ekonomskih nauka, Bukurešt
T2  - Ekonomika poljoprivrede
T1  - Multi attribute assessment approach in vegetable production
T1  - Pristup višeatributivne procene u proizvodnji povrća
EP  - 1364
IS  - 4
SP  - 1355
VL  - 64
DO  - 10.5937/ekoPolj1704355V
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Vico, Grujica and Govedarica-Lučić, Aleksandra and Rajić, Zoran and Bodiroga, Radomir and Mičić, Ivan and Zec-Sambol, Silvija and Mičić, Marija",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Two types of economic effectiveness and two types of economic efficiency, as well as three types of indicators as nutritional quality criteria were used in this paper for ranking certain winter lettuce growing technologies. Four certain types of growing technologies of winter lettuce in greenhouses were ranked by two multi-attribute decision making methods. Results of ranking for both methods, SAW and TOPSIS are shown. Alternatives were ranked by three different scenarios with different weight coefficients. The type of growing technology with combination of mulching + agro textile is the best ranked one according both methods and all scenarios. The SAW method showed more sensitivity on weight coefficients changes than TOPSIS., U radu je korišćeno dvije vrste kriterijuma ekonomske efektivnosti i dvije vrste kriterijuma ekonomske efikasnosti, kao i tri indikatora nutritivnog kvaliteta za rangiranje različitih tehnologija gajenja zimske salate. Korišćenjem dvije metode višeatributivnog odlučivanja, izvršeno je rangiranje četiri različite tehnologije gajenja zimske salate u zaštićenom prostoru. Prikazani su rezultati rangiranja na osnovu oba korišćena metoda, SAW i TOPSIS. Alternative su rangirane kroz tri scenarija koji se razlikuju po težinskim koeficijentima. Tehnologija proizvodnje koja podrazumjeva malč+agrotekstil pokazala se kao najbolja alternativa pri korišćenju oba metoda i svih scenarija. SAW metod se pokazao kao senzitivniji na promjene težinskih koeficijenata u odnosu na TOPSIS metod.",
publisher = "Naučno društvo agrarnih ekonomista Balkana, Beograd, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede, Beograd i Akademija ekonomskih nauka, Bukurešt",
journal = "Ekonomika poljoprivrede",
title = "Multi attribute assessment approach in vegetable production, Pristup višeatributivne procene u proizvodnji povrća",
pages = "1364-1355",
number = "4",
volume = "64",
doi = "10.5937/ekoPolj1704355V"
}
Vico, G., Govedarica-Lučić, A., Rajić, Z., Bodiroga, R., Mičić, I., Zec-Sambol, S.,& Mičić, M.. (2017). Multi attribute assessment approach in vegetable production. in Ekonomika poljoprivrede
Naučno društvo agrarnih ekonomista Balkana, Beograd, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede, Beograd i Akademija ekonomskih nauka, Bukurešt., 64(4), 1355-1364.
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1704355V
Vico G, Govedarica-Lučić A, Rajić Z, Bodiroga R, Mičić I, Zec-Sambol S, Mičić M. Multi attribute assessment approach in vegetable production. in Ekonomika poljoprivrede. 2017;64(4):1355-1364.
doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1704355V .
Vico, Grujica, Govedarica-Lučić, Aleksandra, Rajić, Zoran, Bodiroga, Radomir, Mičić, Ivan, Zec-Sambol, Silvija, Mičić, Marija, "Multi attribute assessment approach in vegetable production" in Ekonomika poljoprivrede, 64, no. 4 (2017):1355-1364,
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1704355V . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the AgroSpace Repository | Send Feedback

re3dataOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the AgroSpace Repository | Send Feedback

re3dataOpenAIRERCUB