Productive and non-productive use of water of common bean under full and deficit irrigation
Abstract
This paper investigates water productivity (WP g m-2), water use efficiency (WUE kg m-3) and productive and nonproductive water of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The experiment was set up in Stara Pazova, 40 km north of Belgrade, during 2018. Three treatments of irrigation regimes, with tree sowing periods (I – April 16, II – May 30, III – July 5) were monitored. A treatment with full irrigation (F), when 100% is covered by ETc (evapotranspiration), a treatment with deficit irrigation (R) with 80% of the ETc and a treatment with deficit irrigation (S) with 60% of ETc were applied in each sowing period. An automatic weather station was set up adjacent to the experimental plots. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was estimated with the FAO Penman-Monteith equation using daily data obtained from the station. Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was calculated as the product of ETo and the dual crop coefficient. The WP values were uniform in all treatments in the I sowing period (15.66-15.8...2 g-2), whereas WUE values ranged from 1.31 kg m-3 (S) to 1.64 kg m-3 (F). In the II sowing period, the WP and WUE varied most, and were the highest in the F treatment (15.54 g-2, 1.58 kg m-3), slightly lower in the R treatment (13.92 g-2, 1.40 kg m-3), and the lowest values were recorded in the S treatment (12.52 g-2, 1.25 kg m-3). In the III sowing period, the highest WP and WUE were in the R treatment (12.24 g-2, 1.57 kg m-3), followed by the F treatment (14.12 g-2, 1.43 kg m-3), whereas the lowest values were observed in the S treatment (13.72 g-2, 1.27 kg m-3). The least unproductive water use was observed in the fully irrigated treatment during the I sowing period (13.46%) and the highest one in III treatment (26.30%).
Keywords:
irrigation / common bean / water use efficiency / water productivity / second crop / sowing datesSource:
2022, 1335, 635-642Publisher:
- Acta Horticulturae
Funding / projects:
- Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Water Resources of Serbia (RS-MESTD-Technological Development (TD or TR)-37005)
URI
https://www.actahort.org/books/1335/1335_80.htmhttp://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6700
Collections
Institution/Community
Poljoprivredni fakultetTY - CONF AU - Lipovac, Aleksa AU - Stričević, Ružica AU - Ćosić, Marija AU - Djurović, Nevenka PY - 2022 UR - https://www.actahort.org/books/1335/1335_80.htm UR - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6700 AB - This paper investigates water productivity (WP g m-2), water use efficiency (WUE kg m-3) and productive and nonproductive water of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The experiment was set up in Stara Pazova, 40 km north of Belgrade, during 2018. Three treatments of irrigation regimes, with tree sowing periods (I – April 16, II – May 30, III – July 5) were monitored. A treatment with full irrigation (F), when 100% is covered by ETc (evapotranspiration), a treatment with deficit irrigation (R) with 80% of the ETc and a treatment with deficit irrigation (S) with 60% of ETc were applied in each sowing period. An automatic weather station was set up adjacent to the experimental plots. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was estimated with the FAO Penman-Monteith equation using daily data obtained from the station. Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was calculated as the product of ETo and the dual crop coefficient. The WP values were uniform in all treatments in the I sowing period (15.66-15.82 g-2), whereas WUE values ranged from 1.31 kg m-3 (S) to 1.64 kg m-3 (F). In the II sowing period, the WP and WUE varied most, and were the highest in the F treatment (15.54 g-2, 1.58 kg m-3), slightly lower in the R treatment (13.92 g-2, 1.40 kg m-3), and the lowest values were recorded in the S treatment (12.52 g-2, 1.25 kg m-3). In the III sowing period, the highest WP and WUE were in the R treatment (12.24 g-2, 1.57 kg m-3), followed by the F treatment (14.12 g-2, 1.43 kg m-3), whereas the lowest values were observed in the S treatment (13.72 g-2, 1.27 kg m-3). The least unproductive water use was observed in the fully irrigated treatment during the I sowing period (13.46%) and the highest one in III treatment (26.30%). PB - Acta Horticulturae T1 - Productive and non-productive use of water of common bean under full and deficit irrigation EP - 642 SP - 635 VL - 1335 DO - 10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1335.80 ER -
@conference{ author = "Lipovac, Aleksa and Stričević, Ružica and Ćosić, Marija and Djurović, Nevenka", year = "2022", abstract = "This paper investigates water productivity (WP g m-2), water use efficiency (WUE kg m-3) and productive and nonproductive water of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The experiment was set up in Stara Pazova, 40 km north of Belgrade, during 2018. Three treatments of irrigation regimes, with tree sowing periods (I – April 16, II – May 30, III – July 5) were monitored. A treatment with full irrigation (F), when 100% is covered by ETc (evapotranspiration), a treatment with deficit irrigation (R) with 80% of the ETc and a treatment with deficit irrigation (S) with 60% of ETc were applied in each sowing period. An automatic weather station was set up adjacent to the experimental plots. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was estimated with the FAO Penman-Monteith equation using daily data obtained from the station. Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was calculated as the product of ETo and the dual crop coefficient. The WP values were uniform in all treatments in the I sowing period (15.66-15.82 g-2), whereas WUE values ranged from 1.31 kg m-3 (S) to 1.64 kg m-3 (F). In the II sowing period, the WP and WUE varied most, and were the highest in the F treatment (15.54 g-2, 1.58 kg m-3), slightly lower in the R treatment (13.92 g-2, 1.40 kg m-3), and the lowest values were recorded in the S treatment (12.52 g-2, 1.25 kg m-3). In the III sowing period, the highest WP and WUE were in the R treatment (12.24 g-2, 1.57 kg m-3), followed by the F treatment (14.12 g-2, 1.43 kg m-3), whereas the lowest values were observed in the S treatment (13.72 g-2, 1.27 kg m-3). The least unproductive water use was observed in the fully irrigated treatment during the I sowing period (13.46%) and the highest one in III treatment (26.30%).", publisher = "Acta Horticulturae", title = "Productive and non-productive use of water of common bean under full and deficit irrigation", pages = "642-635", volume = "1335", doi = "10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1335.80" }
Lipovac, A., Stričević, R., Ćosić, M.,& Djurović, N.. (2022). Productive and non-productive use of water of common bean under full and deficit irrigation. Acta Horticulturae., 1335, 635-642. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1335.80
Lipovac A, Stričević R, Ćosić M, Djurović N. Productive and non-productive use of water of common bean under full and deficit irrigation. 2022;1335:635-642. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1335.80 .
Lipovac, Aleksa, Stričević, Ružica, Ćosić, Marija, Djurović, Nevenka, "Productive and non-productive use of water of common bean under full and deficit irrigation", 1335 (2022):635-642, https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1335.80 . .