Assessment of environmental practices in Serbian meat companies
Само за регистроване кориснике
2016
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
The meat industry is recognized as one of the biggest polluters in the food industry. Previous Studies were much more focused on environmental impacts of the meat industry than on the environmental practices within the meat chain. The aim of this study was to assess environmental practices in Serbian meat companies. The study examined 16 slaughterhouses slaughtering 62.5% of the national production, and 14 meat processing plants contributing 58.2% of meat processing nationally. The level of implementation of environmental practices was evaluated in respect to managing energy usage, water usage, waste handling and wastewater discharge, deployed through five topics: Policy and Objectives; Operational Knowledge; Communication; Performance Measurement and Analysis. Results were examined in respect to the size and type of the meat company and their certification status. Higher levels of implementation of environmental practices were found in large companies as opposed to micro and small siz...ed companies, in slaughterhouses compared to meat processing plants and in certified companies than in non-certified companies. Performance measurement for usage of energy, usage of water and waste water discharge scored the highest. Principal component analysis was used to reduce the dimensionality of the environmental practices into two principal components, termed 'environmental dimension' and 'economic dimension'. The 'environmental dimension' obtained higher loadings than the 'economic dimension' for most of the topics within water, waste and waste water impacts. Energy as an impact was heavily loaded on the 'economic dimension', emphasizing that companies found the greatest financial benefit in energy saving. This bottom-up approach in analyzing environmental practices on-site provides new evidence relating to the meat sector. It can help environmental specialists and managers in the meat sector, directing them as to how to improve environmental practices. Finally, our assessment tool could also motivate other food sectors in analyzing their environmental impacts.
Кључне речи:
Energy / Environmental impact / Meat industry / Waste / Waste water / WaterИзвор:
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112, 2495-2504Издавач:
- Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.126
ISSN: 0959-6526
WoS: 000368207400032
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84958834542
Институција/група
Poljoprivredni fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Djekić, Ilija AU - Blagojević, Bojan AU - Antić, Dragan AU - Cegar, Simo AU - Tomašević, Igor AU - Šmigić, Nada PY - 2016 UR - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4144 AB - The meat industry is recognized as one of the biggest polluters in the food industry. Previous Studies were much more focused on environmental impacts of the meat industry than on the environmental practices within the meat chain. The aim of this study was to assess environmental practices in Serbian meat companies. The study examined 16 slaughterhouses slaughtering 62.5% of the national production, and 14 meat processing plants contributing 58.2% of meat processing nationally. The level of implementation of environmental practices was evaluated in respect to managing energy usage, water usage, waste handling and wastewater discharge, deployed through five topics: Policy and Objectives; Operational Knowledge; Communication; Performance Measurement and Analysis. Results were examined in respect to the size and type of the meat company and their certification status. Higher levels of implementation of environmental practices were found in large companies as opposed to micro and small sized companies, in slaughterhouses compared to meat processing plants and in certified companies than in non-certified companies. Performance measurement for usage of energy, usage of water and waste water discharge scored the highest. Principal component analysis was used to reduce the dimensionality of the environmental practices into two principal components, termed 'environmental dimension' and 'economic dimension'. The 'environmental dimension' obtained higher loadings than the 'economic dimension' for most of the topics within water, waste and waste water impacts. Energy as an impact was heavily loaded on the 'economic dimension', emphasizing that companies found the greatest financial benefit in energy saving. This bottom-up approach in analyzing environmental practices on-site provides new evidence relating to the meat sector. It can help environmental specialists and managers in the meat sector, directing them as to how to improve environmental practices. Finally, our assessment tool could also motivate other food sectors in analyzing their environmental impacts. PB - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford T2 - Journal of Cleaner Production T1 - Assessment of environmental practices in Serbian meat companies EP - 2504 SP - 2495 VL - 112 DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.126 ER -
@article{ author = "Djekić, Ilija and Blagojević, Bojan and Antić, Dragan and Cegar, Simo and Tomašević, Igor and Šmigić, Nada", year = "2016", abstract = "The meat industry is recognized as one of the biggest polluters in the food industry. Previous Studies were much more focused on environmental impacts of the meat industry than on the environmental practices within the meat chain. The aim of this study was to assess environmental practices in Serbian meat companies. The study examined 16 slaughterhouses slaughtering 62.5% of the national production, and 14 meat processing plants contributing 58.2% of meat processing nationally. The level of implementation of environmental practices was evaluated in respect to managing energy usage, water usage, waste handling and wastewater discharge, deployed through five topics: Policy and Objectives; Operational Knowledge; Communication; Performance Measurement and Analysis. Results were examined in respect to the size and type of the meat company and their certification status. Higher levels of implementation of environmental practices were found in large companies as opposed to micro and small sized companies, in slaughterhouses compared to meat processing plants and in certified companies than in non-certified companies. Performance measurement for usage of energy, usage of water and waste water discharge scored the highest. Principal component analysis was used to reduce the dimensionality of the environmental practices into two principal components, termed 'environmental dimension' and 'economic dimension'. The 'environmental dimension' obtained higher loadings than the 'economic dimension' for most of the topics within water, waste and waste water impacts. Energy as an impact was heavily loaded on the 'economic dimension', emphasizing that companies found the greatest financial benefit in energy saving. This bottom-up approach in analyzing environmental practices on-site provides new evidence relating to the meat sector. It can help environmental specialists and managers in the meat sector, directing them as to how to improve environmental practices. Finally, our assessment tool could also motivate other food sectors in analyzing their environmental impacts.", publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford", journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production", title = "Assessment of environmental practices in Serbian meat companies", pages = "2504-2495", volume = "112", doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.126" }
Djekić, I., Blagojević, B., Antić, D., Cegar, S., Tomašević, I.,& Šmigić, N.. (2016). Assessment of environmental practices in Serbian meat companies. in Journal of Cleaner Production Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 112, 2495-2504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.126
Djekić I, Blagojević B, Antić D, Cegar S, Tomašević I, Šmigić N. Assessment of environmental practices in Serbian meat companies. in Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;112:2495-2504. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.126 .
Djekić, Ilija, Blagojević, Bojan, Antić, Dragan, Cegar, Simo, Tomašević, Igor, Šmigić, Nada, "Assessment of environmental practices in Serbian meat companies" in Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 (2016):2495-2504, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.126 . .