Saab, Marie-Therese Abi

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
e2b8afa4-8ee9-4e7e-a752-16d6e013033b
  • Saab, Marie-Therese Abi (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST Models in the Simulation of Sunflower Growth under Different Water Regimes

Todorović, Mladen; Albrizio, Rossella; Životić, Ljubomir; Saab, Marie-Therese Abi; Stockle, Claudio; Steduto, Pasquale

(Wiley, Hoboken, 2009)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Todorović, Mladen
AU  - Albrizio, Rossella
AU  - Životić, Ljubomir
AU  - Saab, Marie-Therese Abi
AU  - Stockle, Claudio
AU  - Steduto, Pasquale
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1988
AB  - This work compares the performance of AquaCrop, a crop simulation model developed by FAO, with that of two well established models, CropSyst and WOFOST, in simulating sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) growth under different water regimes in a Mediterranean environment. The models differ in the level of complexity describing crop development, in the main growth modules driving the simulation of biomass growth, and in the number of input parameters. AquaCrop is exclusively based on the water-driven growth module, in that transpiration is converted into biomass through a water productivity (WP) parameter; Cropsyst is based on both water and radiation driven modules, while WOFOST simulates crop growth using a carbon driven approach and fraction of intercepted radiation. The data used in the analysis were obtained in field experiments with hybrid Sanbro_MR, performed in a typical Mediterranean area of Southern Italy in 2005 and 2007. The models were calibrated on data from a full irrigation treatment in 2007, and were validated on a full irrigation treatment in 2005 and several deficit irrigation (DI) treatments, including regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) and rain-fed (RF) conditions. Although AquaCrop required less input information than CropSystand WOFOST, it performed similarly to them in simulating both biomass and yield at harvesting. The use of different numbers of parameters and crop growth modules by the tested models did not influence substantially the simulation results. Therefore, for management purposes and in conditions of limited input information, the use of simpler models should be encouraged.
PB  - Wiley, Hoboken
T2  - Agronomy Journal
T1  - Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST Models in the Simulation of Sunflower Growth under Different Water Regimes
EP  - 521
IS  - 3
SP  - 509
VL  - 101
DO  - 10.2134/agronj2008.0166s
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Todorović, Mladen and Albrizio, Rossella and Životić, Ljubomir and Saab, Marie-Therese Abi and Stockle, Claudio and Steduto, Pasquale",
year = "2009",
abstract = "This work compares the performance of AquaCrop, a crop simulation model developed by FAO, with that of two well established models, CropSyst and WOFOST, in simulating sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) growth under different water regimes in a Mediterranean environment. The models differ in the level of complexity describing crop development, in the main growth modules driving the simulation of biomass growth, and in the number of input parameters. AquaCrop is exclusively based on the water-driven growth module, in that transpiration is converted into biomass through a water productivity (WP) parameter; Cropsyst is based on both water and radiation driven modules, while WOFOST simulates crop growth using a carbon driven approach and fraction of intercepted radiation. The data used in the analysis were obtained in field experiments with hybrid Sanbro_MR, performed in a typical Mediterranean area of Southern Italy in 2005 and 2007. The models were calibrated on data from a full irrigation treatment in 2007, and were validated on a full irrigation treatment in 2005 and several deficit irrigation (DI) treatments, including regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) and rain-fed (RF) conditions. Although AquaCrop required less input information than CropSystand WOFOST, it performed similarly to them in simulating both biomass and yield at harvesting. The use of different numbers of parameters and crop growth modules by the tested models did not influence substantially the simulation results. Therefore, for management purposes and in conditions of limited input information, the use of simpler models should be encouraged.",
publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken",
journal = "Agronomy Journal",
title = "Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST Models in the Simulation of Sunflower Growth under Different Water Regimes",
pages = "521-509",
number = "3",
volume = "101",
doi = "10.2134/agronj2008.0166s"
}
Todorović, M., Albrizio, R., Životić, L., Saab, M. A., Stockle, C.,& Steduto, P.. (2009). Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST Models in the Simulation of Sunflower Growth under Different Water Regimes. in Agronomy Journal
Wiley, Hoboken., 101(3), 509-521.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0166s
Todorović M, Albrizio R, Životić L, Saab MA, Stockle C, Steduto P. Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST Models in the Simulation of Sunflower Growth under Different Water Regimes. in Agronomy Journal. 2009;101(3):509-521.
doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0166s .
Todorović, Mladen, Albrizio, Rossella, Životić, Ljubomir, Saab, Marie-Therese Abi, Stockle, Claudio, Steduto, Pasquale, "Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST Models in the Simulation of Sunflower Growth under Different Water Regimes" in Agronomy Journal, 101, no. 3 (2009):509-521,
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0166s . .
6
194
141
205